This article surveys research on the Model Error Compensator (MEC) conducted by research groups other than the original proposers. Since the MEC was first proposed by Okajima et al. in 2013, it has been adopted and extended by multiple research groups in Japan and internationally. These independent studies demonstrate the versatility and practical value of the MEC framework across diverse application domains including quadcopters, teleoperation, torsion torque control, data-driven tuning, and educational platforms. Related articles, related papers, and MATLAB links are placed at the bottom.
Author: Hiroshi Okajima, Associate Professor, Kumamoto University, Japan — 20 years of control engineering research
For the comprehensive guide on MEC, see: Model Error Compensator (MEC): Enhance the Robustness of Existing Control Systems
- Why Other Groups' Research Matters
- Application to New Domains
- Quadcopter Control (Endo, Sekiguchi, Nonaka — 2017, 2019)
- Teleoperation with Time Delay (Hatori, Nagakura, Uchimura — 2021)
- Torsion Torque Control (Kawai, Nagao, Yokokura, Ohishi, Miyazaki — 2021)
- Underwater Robot Control (Nishio, Hanazawa, Sagara, Ambar — 2025)
- Boost Converter Control (Satake, Yang, Hagiwara — 2025)
- Data-Driven and Online Tuning
- Data-Driven Tuning (Sano, Yamamoto — 2018)
- Database-Driven MEC in Smart MBD (Wakitani, Yamamoto — 2021, 2023)
- Data-Driven Vehicle Control (Suzuki — 2022)
- Data-Driven Nonlinear Compensation (Yoshida, Ishikawa, Minami — 2023)
- GMV-MEC for Machine Systems (Sugawara, Wakitani, Yamamoto et al. — 2024, 2025)
- Theoretical Analysis and Comparisons
- Relationship between DOB and MEC (Kawada — 2024; Shikada, Sebe — 2023)
- FRIT-Based PID Tuning with MEC (Kawada — 2024)
- Positioning Control with MEC (Matsui, Kawada — 2024)
- Fractional Order MEC (Haddi, Azzouzi, Laabissi — 2024)
- Adaptive Control with MEC (Itamiya — 2024)
- State Predictive Control with MEC (Shimohigashi, Sawada — 2025)
- Summary of Research Directions
- Connections to Related Research
- Related Articles and Videos
- ModelErrorCompensator #MEC #RobustControl #ControlEngineering #DataDrivenControl #DisturbanceObserver #FRIT #AdaptiveControl #FractionalOrder #MATLAB
Why Other Groups' Research Matters
The adoption of MEC by independent research groups provides important evidence of its generality and practical utility. When researchers outside the original development team apply a method to their own problems, it validates the method's applicability beyond the original context. The following survey covers research groups that have explicitly used the MEC framework (with "Model Error Compensator" in their titles or as a core component) in their publications.
The research can be broadly categorized into three directions:
- Application to new domains — applying MEC to systems not originally considered (quadcopters, teleoperation, underwater robots, etc.)
- Data-driven and online tuning — combining MEC with data-driven control methods to automate the design of the error compensator
- Theoretical analysis and comparisons — analyzing the relationship between MEC and other compensation methods such as the Disturbance Observer
Application to New Domains
Quadcopter Control (Endo, Sekiguchi, Nonaka — 2017, 2019)
Endo, Aramaki, Sekiguchi, and Nonaka at Meiji University applied MEC to quadcopter altitude and attitude control in combination with the Fictitious Reference Iterative Tuning (FRIT) method.
- Endo, R. Aramaki, K. Sekiguchi and K. Nonaka, Application of model error compensator based on FRIT to quadcopter, 2017 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA) (2017)
They further developed an online tuning method for the MEC parameters:
- 遠藤, 関口, 野中, モデル誤差補償器のオンライン調整法, 計測自動制御学会論文集, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 156–163 (2019)
This work is significant because it demonstrates that MEC can be combined with data-driven tuning approaches, enabling automatic adjustment of the error compensator without explicit plant identification.
Teleoperation with Time Delay (Hatori, Nagakura, Uchimura — 2021)
Hatori, Nagakura, and Uchimura applied MEC to teleoperation systems with variable and large time delays, combining it with Model Predictive Control (MPC):
- Hatori, H. Nagakura, Y. Uchimura, Teleoperation with variable and large time delay based on MPC and model error compensator, IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (2021)
This application is notable because time-delay systems are inherently challenging for both MEC and conventional control methods. The combination of MPC (for predictive compensation) and MEC (for model error suppression) provides a complementary approach.
Torsion Torque Control (Kawai, Nagao, Yokokura, Ohishi, Miyazaki — 2021)
Kawai et al. combined MEC with a Disturbance Observer for quick torsion torque control using a torsion torque sensor:
- Kawai, S. Nagao, Y. Yokokura, K. Ohishi, T. Miyazaki, Quick Torsion Torque Control Based on Model Error Compensator and Disturbance Observer with Torsion Torque Sensor, IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration 2021 (2021)
This work is interesting because it uses both MEC and DOB simultaneously, suggesting that the two approaches can be complementary rather than competing methods. For a detailed comparison of MEC and DOB as standalone methods, see MEC vs Disturbance Observer: A Structural Comparison.
Underwater Robot Control (Nishio, Hanazawa, Sagara, Ambar — 2025)
Nishio et al. applied MEC to resolved acceleration control of a 3-link dual-arm underwater robot:
- Nishio, Y. Hanazawa, S. Sagara and R. Ambar, Experiments on resolved acceleration control of a 3-link dual-arm underwater robot with model error compensator, Artificial Life and Robotics 2025, DOI: 10.1007/s10015-025-01032-2
- Osugi, R. Nishio, Y. Hanazawa, S. Sagara and R. Ambar, Force control experiment of a 3-link dual-arm underwater robot with model error compensator, The Thirtieth International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics 2025
Underwater robots operate in environments with significant hydrodynamic uncertainty, making MEC's ability to suppress model errors without requiring an inverse model particularly valuable.
Boost Converter Control (Satake, Yang, Hagiwara — 2025)
Satake, Yang, and Hagiwara applied MEC to nonlinear output voltage control of a boost converter:
- 佐竹泰智, 楊熙, 萩原朋道, モデル誤差抑制補償器に基づくブーストコンバータの非線形出力電圧制御, 第69回システム制御情報学会研究発表講演会 (2025)
This extends MEC's application to power electronics, a domain where nonlinear dynamics and parameter variations (due to component aging and temperature) are common.
Data-Driven and Online Tuning
Data-Driven Tuning (Sano, Yamamoto — 2018)
Sano and Yamamoto proposed a data-driven tuning method for MEC:
- Sano and S. Yamamoto, A Data-Driven Tuning Method for Model Error Compensator, Proc. of SICE 2018, pp. 1199–2002 (2018)
This approach eliminates the need for an explicit plant model in the MEC design process, using measured input-output data to directly tune the error compensator parameters.
Database-Driven MEC in Smart MBD (Wakitani, Yamamoto — 2021, 2023)
Wakitani and Yamamoto developed a database-driven MEC within their Smart Model-Based Development (Smart MBD) framework:
- Wakitani and T. Yamamoto, Design of a Database-Driven Model Error Compensator in Smart Model-Based Development, International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems (2021)
脇谷伸, スマートMBDアプローチに基づく制御システム設計—モデルとデータを融合した新しいデジタルものづくりを目指して, システム/制御/情報, Vol. 67, No. 8, pp. 343–348 (2023)
The Smart MBD approach integrates model-based and data-driven design paradigms, where MEC serves as a bridge between the two.
Data-Driven Vehicle Control (Suzuki — 2022)
Suzuki applied data-driven design to MEC for autonomous vehicle velocity control:
- Suzuki and S. Yahagi, Data-driven Design of Model Error Compensator and Fictitious Reference Signals for Vehicle Velocity Control of Autonomous Driving, 2022 22nd International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS) (2022)
鈴木元哉, 制御入力速度飽和した初期実験データによるビークルのデータ駆動予測型制御器調整, 電気学会論文誌C編, Vol. 142, No. 8, pp. 959–970 (2022)
Data-Driven Nonlinear Compensation (Yoshida, Ishikawa, Minami — 2023)
Yoshida, Ishikawa, and Minami developed a data-driven feedback modulator for nonlinear compensator design:
- 吉田, 石川, 南, データ駆動型フィードバック変調器による非線形補償器の設計, 計測自動制御学会論文集, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 252–258 (2023)
GMV-MEC for Machine Systems (Sugawara, Wakitani, Yamamoto et al. — 2024, 2025)
Sugawara, Wakitani, Yamamoto, and colleagues applied a Generalized Minimum Variance (GMV) compensator combined with MEC for hierarchical control of resin processing machinery:
菅原貴弘, 脇谷伸, 山本透, 落岩崇, 富山秀樹, 樹脂加工機械における階層型制御のためのGMV補償器の一設計, 日本機械学会論文集
脇谷伸, 津田竜宏, MPCとMECによるパフォーマンス駆動型階層制御系の一設計, 第69回システム制御情報学会研究発表講演会 (2025)
Theoretical Analysis and Comparisons
Relationship between DOB and MEC (Kawada — 2024; Shikada, Sebe — 2023)
Two independent studies have analyzed the structural relationship between MEC and Disturbance Observer:
川田昌克, 零点と不安定極をもたない2次系に対する外乱オブザーバとモデル誤差抑制補償器の関係について, 計測自動制御学会論文集, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 101–103 (2024)
- Shikada and N. Sebe, Relation between disturbance observer and model error compensator, 2023 SICE ISCS (2023)
These studies provide theoretical confirmation that MEC and DOB can achieve equivalent performance under certain conditions, while differing in their structural requirements and design perspectives.
FRIT-Based PID Tuning with MEC (Kawada — 2024)
Kawada combined MEC with FRIT (Fictitious Reference Iterative Tuning) for PID parameter adjustment:
川田昌克, モデル誤差抑制されたPID制御系のFRITを利用したパラメータ調整とLEGO教材による実験的検証, システム制御情報学会論文誌, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 31–33 (2024)
川田昌克, Arduino/LEGO教材を利用したPID制御の教育事例―経験則,モデルマッチングからデータ駆動制御,外乱補償まで―, 計測と制御, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 185–189 (2024)
Kawada's work is particularly valuable for its educational perspective, demonstrating MEC on LEGO-based experimental platforms that are accessible to students.
Positioning Control with MEC (Matsui, Kawada — 2024)
Matsui and Kawada designed a positioning control system combined with MEC:
- 松井, 川田, モデル誤差抑制補償器を併合する位置決め制御系の設計, システム制御情報学会誌, Vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 203–205 (2024)
Fractional Order MEC (Haddi, Azzouzi, Laabissi — 2024)
Haddi, Azzouzi, and Laabissi extended MEC to fractional-order dynamical systems:
- Haddi, M. E. Azzouzi and M. Laabissi, A design approach of fractional model error compensator for fractional dynamical systems with polytopic uncertainty and disturbance, Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, Vol. 43, pp. 7611–7633 (2024)
This is a significant theoretical extension because fractional-order systems require different mathematical treatment than integer-order systems, and the paper demonstrates that the MEC framework can be generalized to this broader class of dynamical systems.
Adaptive Control with MEC (Itamiya — 2024)
Itamiya investigated the role of MEC as a fixed compensation element in robust model-reference adaptive control:
- 板宮敬悦, モデル誤差抑制補償要素を併用した適応制御系に関する研究, MSCS2024
- 板宮敬悦, ロバストモデル規範形適応制御系における固定補償要素のモデル誤差抑制制御器としての役割, SCI 2024
State Predictive Control with MEC (Shimohigashi, Sawada — 2025)
Shimohigashi and Sawada applied MEC to robustify state predictive control:
- 下東知隼, 澤田賢治, モデル誤差抑制補償器を用いた状態予測制御のロバスト化, 第69回システム制御情報学会研究発表講演会 (2025)
Summary of Research Directions
The following table summarizes the main directions of MEC research by other groups:
| Direction | Groups | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|
| Quadcopter / UAV | Endo, Sekiguchi, Nonaka (Meiji Univ.) | FRIT + MEC, online tuning |
| Teleoperation | Hatori, Uchimura | MPC + MEC for time delay |
| Servo / Torque control | Kawai, Yokokura, Ohishi | DOB + MEC combined |
| Underwater robots | Nishio, Sagara, Ambar | Resolved acceleration control |
| Power electronics | Satake, Yang, Hagiwara | Boost converter nonlinear control |
| Data-driven tuning | Sano, Yamamoto; Wakitani, Yamamoto | Database-driven, Smart MBD |
| Vehicle control | Suzuki | Autonomous driving |
| DOB-MEC theory | Kawada; Shikada, Sebe | Equivalence analysis |
| Educational | Kawada | LEGO + Arduino experiments |
| Fractional order | Haddi, Azzouzi, Laabissi | Extension to fractional systems |
| Adaptive control | Itamiya | MEC in MRAC framework |
| Machine systems | Sugawara, Wakitani, Yamamoto | GMV + MEC hierarchical control |
Connections to Related Research
Model Error Compensator: Comprehensive Guide — For the full overview of MEC including basic structure and all design methods, see the MEC hub article.
Original MEC Paper — H. Okajima, H. Umei, N. Matsunaga and T. Asai, A Design Method of Compensator to Minimize Model Error, SICE JCMSI, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 267–275 (2013). See also the blog article.
MEC + PID Control — Many of the above studies combine MEC with PID control. For a dedicated overview, see MEC + PID Control: Adding Robustness to the Most Widely Used Controller.
MEC vs Disturbance Observer — The theoretical comparisons by Kawada and Shikada/Sebe are closely related to MEC vs DOB: A Structural Comparison.
MEC for Non-Minimum Phase Systems — Several groups have applied MEC to systems where the DOB is difficult to apply. See MEC for Non-Minimum Phase Systems.
MEC for Nonlinear Systems — The quadcopter, vehicle, and underwater robot applications all involve nonlinear dynamics. See MEC for Nonlinear Systems: Robust Feedback Linearization.
MEC Design with LMI — The foundational LMI-based design used by several groups is described in A Design Method of MEC for Systems with Polytopic-Type Uncertainty.
Related Articles and Videos
Blog Articles (blog.control-theory.com)
- Model Error Compensator (MEC): Enhance the Robustness of Existing Control Systems
- A Design Method of Compensator to Minimize Model Error (JCMSI 2013)
- MEC with Parallel Feed-Forward Filter (JCMSI 2017)
- MEC Design for Polytopic Uncertainty (JCMSI 2021)
- MEC for Non-Minimum Phase Systems (JCMSI 2022)
- MEC vs Disturbance Observer: A Structural Comparison
- MEC + PID Control
- MEC for Non-Minimum Phase Systems
- MEC for Nonlinear Systems
- System Identification: Obtaining Dynamical Model
Research Web Pages (www.control-theory.com)
Video
Self-Introduction
Hiroshi Okajima — Associate Professor, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto University. Member of SICE, ISCIE, and IEEE.
If you found this article helpful, please consider bookmarking or sharing it.